Secure Code Review

Find the vulnerabilities before they reach production.

CyVigilant combines manual expert review with SAST tooling to surface insecure code patterns, CWE-listed vulnerabilities, business-logic flaws and OWASP ASVS violations in your source code — before they ship to customers.

What We Review

Manual depth, tool breadth, actionable output.

Manual Expert Code Review

Senior developers and security engineers review business-critical code paths for authentication, authorization, input validation, cryptographic implementation and logic flaws that SAST tools miss entirely.

SAST-Assisted Analysis

Automated SAST scanning (Semgrep, Checkmarx, SonarQube) provides coverage breadth across the entire codebase, with manual triage to remove false positives before findings reach your team.

OWASP ASVS Verification

Systematic verification against OWASP Application Security Verification Standard levels 1–3, with each finding mapped to the specific ASVS requirement it violates.

CWE Mapping

Every finding is mapped to its Common Weakness Enumeration category — SQL injection (CWE-89), path traversal (CWE-22), hardcoded credentials (CWE-798) — giving developers precise remediation targets.

Developer Remediation Guidance

Findings include annotated code snippets showing the vulnerable pattern and a corrected example — written for developers, not compliance teams, so fixes are applied quickly and accurately.

SDLC Integration Support

We work with your engineering team to embed security checkpoints into your CI/CD pipeline — pre-merge SAST rules, security-focused PR review checklists and threat-modelling templates.

Review Process

From codebase access to developer-ready findings.

01

Scope & Access

We agree on in-scope repositories, branches and frameworks. Secure read-only code access is provided via a temporary repository clone or encrypted archive — no production credentials required.

Kickoff in 24 hrs
02

Automated Scanning

SAST tooling runs across the full codebase to identify candidate findings. Results are deduplicated and triaged to remove false positives before manual review begins.

Full codebase covered
03

Manual Deep Review

Senior security engineers review high-risk code paths — authentication, authorization, cryptography, input handling, secrets management — and chain findings into exploitable attack scenarios.

Business logic covered
04

Report & Developer Walkthrough

CVSS-scored findings with CWE mapping, annotated code examples and fix guidance. Optional developer walkthrough session to answer questions and unblock remediation.

Fix examples included

Code review metrics that matter

0+Code review engagements
0+Vulnerabilities surfaced
0+Languages and frameworks covered
0%Findings with annotated fix examples

Secure code review — frequently asked questions

Ready to review your codebase?

Talk to a security expert